Rolling Stone's hit piece on...Jill Stein?!?
Updated: 4 days ago
For some reason, reading really pissed me off this weekend. So I’m reading Rolling Stone’s article The Case Against Jill Stein and it was written by maybe the most biased writer I’ve come across in a while, Tessa Stuart. Tessa is one of Rolling Stone’s political reporters and she doesn’t even TRY to tell two sides of a story, but The Case Against Jill Stein was the last straw.
Jill Stein is running for President for the Green Party Ticket. I have admiration for the Greens from the Ralph Nader days, and even though I’m voting for Gary Johnson, I don’t have a problem with Stein. Jill Stein, though, is only polling at 3% and she is really struggling for traction. That’s not my opinion, that’s a fact. So Tessa Stuart comes out today and tells the 3% not to vote Stein, but to vote for, guess who? Hillary Clinton. Isn’t Tessa Stuart the one who wrote the article a few weeks ago, The Case Against Gary Johnson, I thought to myself. I looked it up and, low and behold, she is. Then I looked up her last 30(!) political articles and here’s the synopsis:
Weiner/Wasserman-Shultz Scandals - 2
Black Gun Owners and Racism - 1
On almost every single episode of Beacon of Speech, Donald Trump’s Presidential run has come up and the topic of Trump sucks the air out of the room every single time. But I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with the Clinton supporters acting like her shit doesn’t stink. If I had Tessa Stuart in the Beacon of Speech studios, she’d probably say, “I’m not biased at all, see, I’ve only written one Pro-Clinton article, I’m a Sanders supporter.” Then I’d have to have Ted pick her up and throw her out into the lawn.
I’m going to make a prediction: When WikiLeaks drops the next Clinton Bombshell, Tessa Stuart will write an article about….Donald Trump is a jerk.
(I’m going to try to calm down and get a good nights rest and try to write about exoplanets tomorrow. Honest.)