Hillary Clinton's Epstein Problem
- Fred
- 17 hours ago
- 3 min read
This was the headline over at The Blaze this morning: Clintons defy Epstein Subpoenas — but Glenn Beck says DON’T jail them. Here’s his shocking reason why.
Let's pause for a second. In over a dozen Beacon of Speech Epstein articles, we have NEVER mentioned Hillary Clinton's name. Never. The Core Four names that come up in every file drop are: Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, and Bill Gates.
Why would the government subpoena HILLARY Clinton?
Let's get into the time machine.
Back on January 19, 1993, the Clintons and the Gores danced the night away listening to Fleetwood Mac at Bill Clinton's Inauguration. Optimism reigned supreme as the two power couples ushered in a new era of American Politics.
In 1998, the Monica Lewinsky Scandal shattered any illusion of a happy marriage between the Clintons themselves. But if you had your ear to the ground, you would have heard the rumblings of Bill Clinton's Bimbo Eruptions for a decade.
But Hillary stayed with him and played the martyr. Why did she stay with him? That's the $100 million question. Actually, the answer is $100 million.
When the Clintons left the White House, the were famously "dead broke."
Again, it is hard to go from broke to $100 million net worth (2024) on Civil Servant salaries. Enter Jeffrey Epstein.
As Donald Trump is supposedly tearing America apart from the inside, both the Clintons and the Gores are suspiciously quiet.
First of all, the Gores shockingly divorced about a decade ago. The cause? They grew apart. When I googled what Al Gore is up to today, it says that he is very active appearing on Talk Shows (like Seth Meyers) and producing videos for C-Span. He famously sold his cable station to Al Jazeera for half a billion dollars. Tipper Gore is in nature taking photographs with her famous boyfriend Bill Allen. For all intensive purposes, they are out of the public eye.
Before the Clintons' subpoena, you wondered how the Clintons even stayed together. Jeffrey Epstein's day job was as a financier. The Clintons' financial windfalls also coincided with their relationship with Epstein.
Is it feasible that Epstein gave the Clintons shady, non-public, monetary tips? Absolutely.
Is it conceivable that Epstein helped the Clintons get rich and trafficked underaged girls to Bill at his island? Circumstantial evidence fits that timeline.
Now your defense of the Clintons is that they were simply shrewd investors and Bill only cheated on his wife with, legal, college-aged girls (like Lewinsky)? Wow, for a best-case scenario, that's not really a great look, either.
If you're Hillary Clinton, why in the world wouldn't you divorce Bill? Unless you were ankle deep in the same mess he's in, you cut your losses, you've suffered enough public humiliations.
Now I'm not saying Bill took Hillary to Little Saint James Island, I am 100% positive that he left her behind.
But Hillary's no dummy, she NOW knows what was going on at that island. She also knows that if she divorces Bill, she loses her Spousal Testimonial Privilege. Right now, the Gores are enjoying their own lives. If the Clintons get divorced, they could be forced to testify against each other in a court of law.
Would you stay with your cheating spouse if it meant it kept you out of jail for insider trading?
That's a strictly rhetorical question.

